Abstract__ Present emerging focus on novel hydrogen storage have offer nanostructured materials hold sufficient and unique features to store optimum value. This review paper specifically stand to transport exceptional and appropriate performance of nanostructured materials such as activated carbons ACs, carbon nanotubes CNTs, graphene of forms nano carbon and metal-organic frameworks MOF to the nearest generation for storing hydrogen. To improved and enhance the feature of these potential structured physisorption and chemisorption can in touch quantify storing capacity with the kinetic conduct at temperature and pressure loading Keywords’ Nanostructured materials, Hydrogen storage, Physisorption, Chemisorption INTRODUCTION The fundamental property of hydrogen is the sterilize energy carrier, it can be produced from several natural and domestic resources, which cover renewable energy such as (hydro, wind, solar energy, biomass) fossil fuels and nuclear energy consumption. Accordingly, due to gradual and the growing rate of global warming and alarming climate change may expected to climb up energy consumption and demands which can be foreseen as inadequate over the population growth and for future uses. The department of energy of us has comments hydrogen storage would reach 6.5 wt% by 2010 but with development of adorbates may lesson loading of quantity. However, in efforts to meet the required energy for commercialize and related automobile industries, nanostructured materials microporous materials, carbon materials and more precisely carbon nanotubes, polymer nanocomposites, and metal organic frameworks, mof) are emergently studied because of their potential and unusual magnetic, optical, mechanical, electrical and surface properties. The energy storage of these materials has high volume ratio with important implications and outcomes in various sciences such as electronics, optics, opto-electronics, tribology, human medicine, biotechnology and others . Subsequently material science is also contributing for important issues as energy production and storage also number of relevant studies on materials structured on the nano length scale. Accordingly, the aim of this review paper to focus obstacles, unique characteristics, and actual conflict of storage in carbon based technologies and to highlight developed nanostructured carbon materials that exhibit promising candidate to store hydrogen by mechanisms of physisorption and chemisorption. While, due to these two mechanism of hydrogen storage where physisorption mean adsorption, whereas hydrogen molecules is weakly bind by van der Waals with materials surface of hydrogen and in the case of chemisorption mean absorption, molecules of hydrogen isolate into atomic hydrogen and absorbed into the great formation of stronger ionic and covalent bonds with the materials. Currently, three practical techniques used to store hydrogen: which are compression, liquefaction and solid state forms. Respectively each technique gives up its specific disadvantages. Presently, there are basically three viable techniques to store hydrogen: compression, liquefaction and solid state forms. Each technique suffers from its specific disadvantages. However, solid forms method of hydrogen storage is the most demanding choice that can lead in achieving the gravimetric and volumetric densities. In understanding of these capable qualities, it is not unexpected that nanostructured carbon materials store high size hydrogen has reveal foremost field in science and technology. Hydrogen Storage by Physisorption and Chemisorption Mechanism Physisorptive Base Hydrogen Storage The hydrogen storage by physisorption mechanism submits adsorption of hydrogen molecule on a surface by relatively weak van der Waals bonding. Of developing satisfactory physisorbent that will use for high volume hydrogen storage has basically highlights three parameters which are, intrinsic binding energy between the absorbent and the hydrogen, the accessible adsorption surface, and the bulk density of the adsorbent. Of them the last two parameters have frequently suggested a composite parameters, e.g., the surface average offer per unit volume of the adsorbent substance. Though for any application, the composite parameter must be maximized and the intrinsic binding energy must be operate and tailored via according to the temperature of the hydrogen storing techniques. Research studies have addressed many variety of solid forms materials in hydrogen physisorption . The most often studied sorbents are activated carbons, carbon nanostructured materials (e.g. fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, nanographene flakes) and metal-organic frameworks. Although carbonaceous materials having enhanced structure have been investigated at room temperature at 77 K and of course the carbonaceous materials have submitted great areas of focus, where limited categorize can be assist to (microporous activated carbons, activated carbon fibers and such amorphous CNTs and SWCNTs. The functionality and attractiveness of these solid materials has deliver that each absorbent must be optimized for hydrogen storage by physisorption mechanism. However the capacity of these materials with time has proven traits of reliable developments and way of conduct unlike controversial examine. Linearly the storage capacity at a room temperature was found with varying pressure, thus the adsorption acceptably of above examples at 77 K referred using the Langmuir model. The characterized materials with the elevated surface area and nanopore size and there adsorption by nitrogen was associated with capacity of hydrogen storage at 77 K to deliver direct tally samples surface area and the hydrogen uptake. Similarly, the highest operating nanomaterials has a 4.5 wt % at 77 K m2/g storage capacity with the specific area of 2560 . On the other side research worked have denied storage capacities in outsized materials . Table 1- Carbons materials H2 storage by physisorption ____________________________________________ Carbons materials Temp, K Pres MPa H2 Storage ____________________________________________ Super activated carbon 93’293 79.4 23.8 Microporous 77 0.1’1 0.03’23.8 activated carbons CNTs and SWCNTs 298’395 9’14 0.3’20.0 MWCNTs 298 1’10 4 GNFs 300 8 10’15 Porous carbon 77 0.1 0.5’7.5 MOFs 77 0.1 5 High purity 13.8 0.007 4 chemically activated carbons ____________________________________________ I. Carbon nanotubes CNTs are the recent developed carbonaceous materials discovery in 1991 by Iijima, has fascinating sourcing traits to store hydrogen . The measurement of CNTs typically to treat some internal portion accessible for dispersion of gas and to suggestedly to escalate adsorption and accessible surface area. Experimentally and theoretically CNTs claimed up to 20 wt% hydrogen loading at liquid nitrogen temperature . Whereas in at ambient temperature such materials has highlight the hydrogen storage loading is less the 1 wt% at pressures up to 100 bar . Analysis of hydrogen storage capacity of various carbon materials . The main worth advantage of CNTs is, that are practically known by their carbon structure and this fascinating trait allow storage mechanism with correlation of both theoretical and experimental. Research studies projected that the single wall carbon nanotubes SWCNTs at least with two fullerenes (C60) consisting absorbent substances fixed and work inside as trigger valves . Still at 7.7 wt% at pressures or > 10,000 bar capacity of hydrogen adsorption. Eventually number of report focused that CNTs have undermined hydrogen absorption compare to to activated carbons . In a point ACs adsorb 9.2 wt% with the temperature 115 K when obtain split shape pores. Of the above direction there are many recent research on CNTs and other carbon materials hydrogen storage admitted huge capacity. Dillon et al (1997) admit such a large and substantial hydrogen adsorption in single-walled CNTs at ambient temperature in the loading direction of 5 between 10 wt% in a low purity density . Additionally graphite nanofibers (GNFs), noted 67 wt% at 25??C and 120 bar of hydrogen pressure . Thus CNTs materials has large site capacity of hydrogen atoms adsorption. II. Activated Carbon Activated Carbon seems one the best hydrogen storage media. ACs has appeared with the gas adsorption studies and these materials have performing parameter through which the capacity of hydrogen storage produced. Such as pore volume, total pore volume and specific surface area. Unlike CNTs activated carbons also predict a special trait of reversibility in the form of rapid kinetic adsorption. The parameters are in good concern because of their relativity with the specific surface area and pore volume. Activated carbons are the organic signs which produced by step of an activation stage of chemical treatment by a process of carbonizing. In the follow of such materials yield specific surface area with hydrogen loading capacity up to 2900 m2/g at 77 K  . Thus experimental approaches say ACs hydrogen adsorb values predicate 5.8 wt % with marking solid variation at 77 K . III. Graphene Graphene nature also include, e.g. graphitic carbons, graphite nanofibers and nanohorns. These materials are graphene sheet structured which has unique inter layering characteristics and produced graphene strong candidate to adsorb hydrogen storage. Studies reported that these structure has 20 L hydrogen storage capacity at 298 K in a per gram. Another worked by Browning et al. submitted that graphite carbon nanofibers had predicated up to 6.3 wt% at 12 MPa pressure at ambient temperature . IV. Metal’organic frameworks MOFs are most considerable candidate for hydrogen storage with having high surface area. Metal organic frameworks are crystalline form materials organized with polymer molecules. The favourable hydrogen storage in the MOF materials with high surface area absorb greater than 7.7 wt%. Contrary in ACs only 5 wt% with 77 K noted under settled condition . The important feature of MOFs is on base and suitable temperature. CHEMISORPTIVE BASE STUDIES OF HYDROGEN STORGAE Chemisorption mechanism is creative and has high volume absorbent to storage such an overestimate of H2. This type of storage is most essentially to understand the better way and reversible storage system. On base of hydrogen storing phenomena this system could deliver three perfect way, the accessible adsorption surface, intrinsic binding energy and the bulk density of the adsorbent, while these three parameter in contrast of physisorption verified lot of challenge and difficulties . Table 2- Carbons materials H2 storage by chemisorption ____________________________________________ Carbons materials Temp, K Pre MPa H2 Storage ____________________________________________ CNTs and fullerene 298 0.1 9 CNTs (Li, K) 298’673 ‘ 14’20 CNMs (Mg) 363’453 0.5 5’7.6 CNTs (Alkali metals) 80 12 2 SWCNTs and 298 9 0.7 Activated carbons (Pd) Ordered mesoporous 77 0.5’1.6 0.78 H/Pd Carbons (Pd) Graphene sheets and 298 ‘ 1.4 H/Pt SWCNTs (Pt) ____________________________________________ I. Carbon nanotubes In the previous note defined that carbon nanotubes CNTs with a alter hydrogen storage capacity and these basic distinguished between chemisorptive and physisorptive make CNTs more advantageous. Among the previous section histories on CNTs the hydrogen storage will correlated some alkali metal CNTs has been reported hydrogen adsorption . Thus these group of materials introduced hydrogen adsorption at 77 K with agreement of theory and experiment. Some other CNTs form e.g., hydrides and complex hydrides and magnesium hydride materials had been studies with high variation hydrogen storage capacity up to 7, 7 wt% upon on well-meaning reversibility. But the drawback of magnesium with other hydride materials as in hydrogen release at high temperature may slow desorption and may react with air and oxidized . Whereas in complex hydrides series of beryllium, Sodium and lithium are most studied but in Lithium borohydride submitted extremely high hydrogen storage (19 wt%) on form of solid state. Nevertheless, the drawback remain same as magnesium but the high temperature can slow kinetic properties. II. Mesoporous carbons These substance in the form of carbon materials further with the intermetallic composites such as (palladium Pd-doped) on improved feature H2 capacity well defined storage between 9-10 wt% . Techniques and Experimental Approach Hydrogen Storage techniques in method are X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electron microscopic analysis, FT-IR, XRD, 13C NMR and FT-Raman techniques. Latter these experimental approach has to measure the hydrogen capacity with the required materials. Marking that Xua et al. use some materials like ACs, SWCNTs, GNFs, and graphite hydrogen storage at room temperature and 77 K . In the result the materials with correlated volume and surface area showed the storing of hydrogen at room temperature less than 1 w%. In addition, Techniques on the analysis may use further with appropriate materials. Conclusion Nanostructured materials no doubt reveal its advantages to current and future use to capture and storage hydrogen over on commercial and other mobile industry together with the physisortpion and chemisorption mechanism. Presently some nanomatrials such as activated carbons ACs and CNTs employ flexibilities and detect hydrogen storage with kinetic performance. While, Uptake in these promising candidate may meet the target 6.5 wt% hydrogen loading of DOE.